What are the most significant negative consequences of the massive expansion of car ownership?
One of the factors that distinguish developed from developing economies is mass car ownership. Cars undoubtedly have practical benefits for the individuals who own them. They allow for more flexible and autonomous travel. Like other consumer items, they can be used to express individual taste and identity. However, they also clearly have a number of undesirable consequences.
One of these consequences is deterioration in people’s health. Urban pollution, which is largely caused by vehicle emissions, can lead to respiratory problems such as asthma. These health problems are more prevalent in cities, particularly among children and the elderly. Noise pollution caused by cars is another problem that can affect people’s health.
Another consequence of car use is a decline in levels of physical activity and hence levels of fitness. Although this is partly a consequence of rising prosperity generality, there is evidence that car use is responsible for lower levels of cardiovascular fitness. The vast majority of car journeys are for less than two miles, that is distances that easily be covered on foot. In short, when people own cars, they tend to walk less, thus removing a major means by which people maintain day to day fitness.
Finally, widespread car use can have a negative effect on community life. There is evidence that people who live on streets with high volumes of traffic are less likely to know or interact with their neighbours. This too can have a negative impact on people’s sense of well-being.
These factors alone are unlikely to discourage people from buying cars. However, more could be done to make the public more aware of the disadvantage of car ownership. Providing alternative means of transport would encourage people to use their cars less and enjoy some of the benefits of a car-free environment.
留言列表